🔥 Trending on HN

Could Siri Choose Its AI? Apple Code Points to a More Open Assistant

2 min read Tiny Why Newsroom · By Curio, Martian correspondent

Words
Siri(SEER-ee)

Apple's voice assistant for its devices.

Model Delegation(MODEL del-ih-GAY-shun)

A way for Siri to hand a request to another AI model.

Inference Providing(IN-fer-ens pro-VY-ding)

A way for another model to receive Siri's instructions and handle system requests.

What happened

Apple, the company behind iPhones and Macs, runs Siri, its voice assistant. MacRumors reported that code researcher pdfu found private frameworks in iOS 27 and macOS Golden Gate. The report also described demonstration videos.

The report shows two possible paths. First, Model Delegation could let Claude, Anthropic's AI model, appear as a Siri extension. In a demo, a Mac user selected Claude from a Search or Ask menu. Claude understood a reminder request. Siri then created the reminder in Apple's Reminders app. Another example showed Claude creating a CSV file, which Siri could not handle itself.

Second, an Inference Providing protocol appears to let another model replace Apple's server-side Siri model. The outside model would receive Siri's planning instructions and tool definitions. It could request system actions and receive personal data. In the demo, ChatGPT, OpenAI's AI assistant, searched emails about a topic. It summarized their contents and action points. It then sent a message to someone in Contacts. Siri displayed the answer through its own interface and voice. The response was also shown in OpenAI's platform interface.

The background

These paths are related, but not identical. Model Delegation is a handoff to another model. Inference Providing appears to replace the model behind Siri. The current macOS 27 release candidate exposes Ask... only for the ChatGPT extension. Claude is not available there. Apple has not opened the model-delegation entitlement to third-party developers. The feature is not user-facing yet. MacRumors says the European Union's Digital Markets Act may have influenced Apple's design. The European Commission has said its access principle includes Siri.

Why it matters

This is more than a choice between chatbots. A chosen model could help operate Apple features. It could also handle email, contacts, and other personal information. That creates a new trust question. Which model sees the data? Which model may act? Who asks for permission? If Siri keeps its familiar interface and voice, users will need clear answers about the model doing the work.

What the report documents

The report documents code and demonstrations pointing to these connections. It does not confirm a public Apple feature, a Claude launch, or a complete model swap. Hacker News listed 219 points and 155 comments. Those numbers show community attention. They do not prove the report is correct.

What remains unknown

Apple's final plans are unclear. We do not know which models will qualify. We do not know how permissions, data routing, storage, or failed actions will work. We also do not know whether Apple will expose the deeper replacement path.

What to watch next

The useful checks are Apple's release notes, developer documentation, and privacy explanations. Watch whether outside developers receive access. Watch whether Claude appears, and how Siri labels the model. The story's main signal is architectural: Siri may become a front door for several AI systems. The code shows a direction, not a finished promise.

💬 What swappable Siri models could—and could not—mean

The code discussed in the article appears to separate Siri’s interface from the model behind it. That suggests Apple could change providers, but it does not prove that users can freely choose any AI or that the design satisfies EU rules.

  • The clearest distinction in the thread is between Apple being able to swap the backend in its own code and users being allowed to select ChatGPT, Claude, a local model, or another provider themselves.
  • Commenters imagine a hybrid route: simple requests handled on-device, harder ones sent to Apple’s Private Cloud or a third-party model. Some also want a LAN endpoint so personal data never leaves their network.
  • On the EU question, some commenters interpret the DMA as requiring competing AI systems to have first-class access and to replace Siri completely, not merely sit underneath the Siri interface. Others reject Apple’s account and argue for stronger user choice.
  • Model routing and checking whether an answer was good are themselves difficult AI problems. A distributed local-cloud-provider architecture could therefore make the user experience harder to design and debug.
  • For Apple, Siri could become a central gateway to many AI systems while avoiding the cost of building every frontier model itself. Critics see possible lock-in, or a low-risk fallback after Apple’s own AI effort disappointed.
  • Users report mixed current performance: some say Google Assistant worked better for smart-home control; one beta user reported that a command for two rooms affected only one; another reported an identity-check loop roughly one time in three. These are personal reports, not independent benchmarks.

initial digest at 155 comments (revision 1). We fetched 100 comments and sampled 100 across the thread. These are HN users’ reports, not independently verified facts.

🔥 Trending on HN

Apple may let Siri use more than one AI

📰 Full story: Could Siri Choose Its AI? Apple Code Points to a More Open Assistant

Apple makes iPhones and Macs. Siri is Apple's voice assistant. Claude is Anthropic's AI model. ChatGPT is OpenAI's AI assistant. MacRumors reports code showing deeper links among them. The feature is not public yet.

1 min read Tiny Why Newsroom · By Curio, Martian correspondent

Words
Siri(SEER-ee)

Apple's voice assistant.

Model Delegation(MODEL del-ih-GAY-shun)

A way to use another AI as a Siri add-on.

Hacker News(HACK-er news)

A site where people discuss and rate technology news.

💡 The gist

  • Siri may let users choose outside AI models.
  • Demos showed reminders, files, emails, and messages.
  • The code is evidence, not a finished Apple feature.

Code is a set of instructions for a computer. MacRumors says a code researcher found private frameworks in iOS 27 and macOS Golden Gate. The report describes two routes.

One route is called Model Delegation. It lets another AI act as a Siri add-on. In a demo, a user chose Claude from a Mac menu. Claude understood a reminder request. Siri created the reminder in Reminders. Claude also made a CSV file.

Another route looks deeper. It may replace Apple's server-side Siri model. The outside model gets Siri's planning instructions and tool definitions. It can ask for system actions. It can receive personal information.

In another demo, ChatGPT searched emails. It summarized the emails and action points. It sent a message to a contact. Siri showed the result using its own screen and voice.

Why does this matter? Siri would not only answer questions. A chosen model could help control Apple features. That makes privacy and permission important. People need to know which model sees their data.

Still, the report has limits. The ChatGPT extension was the only Ask... option in the reported Mac release candidate. Claude was not available. Apple had not opened the deeper access to other developers. The feature was not shown to users.

The European Union's Digital Markets Act may be part of the background. The report connects it with access to Siri features.

Hacker News listed 219 points and 155 comments. This measures attention. It does not prove the code or report is correct.

Next, check Apple's documentation and privacy details. Also watch whether Claude appears. The main idea is simple: Siri might become a doorway to several AI models.

💬 Can Siri use different AI models?

The code seems to make Siri’s hidden AI replaceable. But that does not mean users can choose any AI they want.

  • Apple may be able to change the AI behind Siri, while still keeping Siri’s app and branding. That is different from letting each user choose a provider.
  • People hope easy tasks can run on the phone and harder tasks can use the cloud or another company’s AI. Some want a local model for privacy.
  • Commenters disagree about the EU: is changing the hidden model enough, or must another AI be able to replace Siri itself? Some also challenge Apple’s explanation.
  • Choosing the right AI and checking its answer are difficult. The system could become complicated.
  • User reports are mixed: Google Assistant allegedly worked better for smart-home tasks, one two-room command affected only one room, and another user saw identity checks about one time in three. These are anecdotes, not a full performance test.

initial digest at 155 comments (revision 1). We fetched 100 comments and sampled 100 across the thread. These are HN users’ reports, not independently verified facts.

🔥 Trending on HN

Siri might talk with Claude and ChatGPT

📰 Full story: Could Siri Choose Its AI? Apple Code Points to a More Open Assistant

Apple makes iPhones. Siri is Apple's voice helper. Claude is a computer helper from Anthropic. ChatGPT is a computer helper from OpenAI. Some hidden instructions show them working with Siri. It is not ready for everyone.

1 min read Tiny Why Newsroom · By Curio, Martian correspondent

Words
Siri(SEER-ee)

Apple's voice helper.

Claude(KLAWD)

A computer helper made by Anthropic.

Hacker News(HACK-er news)

A place where people notice and discuss news.

AI means a computer helper that works with words. Code means instructions for computers.

MacRumors showed what a code watcher found. One example used Claude. Claude understood a request for a reminder. Siri put the reminder into Apple's app.

Another example used ChatGPT. ChatGPT looked for emails. It made them shorter. It also sent a message.

This means another AI might help Siri do jobs. The other AI could see some of your mail and names. It might ask Apple apps to do things. People will need clear safety rules.

Right now, this is not a button everyone has. The report says ChatGPT was available in one limited Mac menu. Claude was not there. Apple has not opened the deeper choice for other app makers.

Hacker News talked about the story. It had 219 points and 155 comments. That means many people noticed it. It does not mean Apple finished the feature.

Next, we can watch Apple. We can see which helpers Siri allows.

💬 The idea of changing Siri’s AI

Siri may be able to use a different AI brain. But we do not know if people can freely pick the brain they want.

  • Small jobs could happen on the phone, while big jobs go to a computer far away. Some people want everything to stay at home for privacy.
  • People disagree about the EU rule: should only Siri’s hidden brain change, or should a whole different helper be allowed to replace Siri?
  • Some users say Google’s helper was better with home gadgets, and one person said Siri followed only one of two room instructions. Those are personal stories, not a test of everyone’s experience.

initial digest at 155 comments (revision 1). We fetched 100 comments and sampled 100 across the thread. These are HN users’ reports, not independently verified facts.

Sources